4 ms·
Actually, it's not rendered smoothly at all - when you take a look at the smallest size on google's site, this is what you see: http://twitpic.com/1pd6id http:/
by arnorhs 16y ago
Actually, it's not rendered smoothly at all - when you take a look at the smallest size on google's site, this is what you see:
http://twitpic.com/1pd6id http://twitpic.com/1pd6id
edit: This seems to only be an issue with the way Windows renders fonts. The fonts look awesome in Ubuntu or Mac systems
- ianbishop 16y agoIt does render smoothly: http://grab.by/4tF8 http://grab.by/4tF8 This must be a browser issue. I am running Safari 4.0.5(6531.22.7)
- tzury 16y agothis is my screenshot Ubuntu+Chrome - http://yfrog.com/3uscreenshotvollkornfontfp http://yfrog.com/3uscreenshotvollkornfontfp smooth and sweet. all seems fine. it seems like windows issue more than google issue.
- arnorhs 16y agoyes that's a point, but if the font is well made (like the example font from font squirrel) the font looks much better. Even though it's fine on your computer, it's not fine at all on windows machines
- ComputerGuru 16y agoSmooth here on OS X + Chrome 5
- GFischer 16y agoIt looks awful for me in his blog, using Firefox 3.6.3 . However, it renders decently on the Google site, I don't see it like how you show it on twitpic.