Incorrect – the defendant had an iPhone which contained indecent recordings of his niece, and had previously admitted to family members that he had a problem wi

Incorrect – the defendant had an iPhone which contained indecent recordings of his niece, and had previously admitted to family members that he had a problem with child pronography, showing them a large collection on the computer that was connected to the hard drives he now claims to have forgotten how to decrypt. This is explained in government brief[1] which was linked in the article. [1] https://arstechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/fedsrawls.pdf https://arstechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/fedsrawls...