Sure, gerrit has a learning curve. When you end up using it for a long time, going back to pull requests is awful. Its basic things: - history of a PR - I ca

Sure, gerrit has a learning curve. When you end up using it for a long time, going back to pull requests is awful. Its basic things: - history of a PR - I cannot see the diff of last version of the patch and latest - dependant changes - I need to do some work that depends on a patch someone else is working on. This can't be done in github. - clean history - no "added tests", "fixed docs typo" etc commits I learnt recently that most people don't use git-review[0] - and yeah, if you are manually doing the "git push gerrit ref/for/master" crap, it's really annoying. but git review and repo were written to help that. 0 - http://docs.openstack.org/infra/git-review/ http://docs.openstack.org/infra/git-review/