4 ms·
In Netherlands it is common to have rather cold temperatures in houses even if people can afford to pay for warmth. And cold requires body to spend much more en
by fpoling 10y ago
In Netherlands it is common to have rather cold temperatures in houses even if people can afford to pay for warmth. And cold requires body to spend much more energy that is coming directly from burning body fat unless one shivering from cold.
In fact if one wants to loose like 10 kilos quickly, just climb to Everest. Most of that weight will be spent on body heating, not muscular work.
That also explains why butter does not harm people in Tibet. It is not stored as body fat and goes directly into body heat.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- awjr 10y agoThat's an interesting one I had not considered. Culturally living in a cold environment and not wrapping up warm will have an effect on calorie burn.
- mrfusion 10y agoDo you have any references on that? I was under the impression being cold didn't really burn that many more calories. I'll stop wearing a jacket if I can burn hundreds of calories.
- Retric 10y agoSitting in a cold room burns an extra 50+ calories an hour if you are not dressed for it. That does add up, but is also unpleasant.
- fpoling 10y agoJust read hypothermics.com . Its author, Ray Cronise, has done a lot of measurements using proper equipment. And anecdotaly I have a co-worker who was into serious climbing. Before a high climb like over 6km he on purpose typically gained like 5 kilos of weight and still came back learner from the trip. And he knows for sure that that was due to coldness as on much more physically demanding trips at warmer altitudes weight loss was much smaller.
- rjsw 10y agoMy understanding is that you also burn more energy at altitude. This has been given as one of the problems that Scott faced when man-hauling sledges on the Antarctic plateau at 3000m.
- bmelton 10y ago"Being cold" does not have any particular caloric advantage until and unless you are cold enough to shiver. Shivering, as it happens, is a fantastic way to burn calories, and 15 minutes of shivering is equivalent to approximately an hour's worth of exercise. http://www.livestrong.com/article/317620-how-many-calories-are-burned-by-being-cold/ http://www.livestrong.com/article/317620-how-many-calories-a...
- JoeAltmaier 10y agoThat link contradicts that? "even mild cold that doesn't cause you to shiver starts to burn through those brown fat stores, jumpstarting your caloric burn rate." Famously, Inuit team drivers for Arctic expeditions would eat all the butter out of the food supplies first.
- bmelton 10y agoIndeed. Thanks for the correction. The science, as I understand it, is that just being cold, but not to the point of shivering, will help boost your metabolism if you're performing exercise, while just being cold while idle will burn a basically insignificant amount of calories.
- vram22 10y agoInteresting. Is that on purpose, to help lose fat, or to get the body used naturally handling a wider range of temperatures (I've read yoga prescribes that to some extent), or something else?