3 ms·
I understood that reference to "Impossible standard" to mean from a jurisprudence perspective. If you want to insist that "100% proof" and reasonable doubt are
by grzm 10y ago
I understood that reference to "Impossible standard" to mean from a jurisprudence perspective.
If you want to insist that "100% proof" and reasonable doubt are the same, that's of course your choice. I think you'll find that people will tend to disagree with you.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- jdmichal 10y agoFair enough. I think anything beyond this point dives pretty fast into a philosophical debate on "knowability", which I don't think either of us are actually interested in. Cheers.
- grzm 10y agoIndeed! I'm sure there's a lot of great judicial literature on the topic if you're interested in diving further. My armchair is pretty comfy though, and I think I'm likely to doze off before getting too deep into it. :)