4 ms·
Interesting question. Partially it's that the global car market is huge so there's enough profit to go around even with a lot of companies. I think the more im
by gydfi 10y ago
Interesting question. Partially it's that the global car market is huge so there's enough profit to go around even with a lot of companies.
I think the more important reason is historical, though. The car companies of today were almost all established back in the days when shipping cars internationally was expensive, and operating a factory in a foreign country was difficult. So each major industrialised country wound up with a few manufacturers after a lot of consolidation -- in the US dozens of manufacturers got reduced down to three. Then there's three German, two French, one (major) Italian... Japan is a weird case but it is still consolidating... Only in the last few decades has the car market become really global, and as a result there's ongoing consolidation continuing, eg Fiat-Chrysler and Renault-Nissan.
- baddox 10y agoI don't know if it's true, but I wouldn't be surprised if many states didn't heavily subsidize their own car manufacturers early in the automobile boom.
- dsr_ 10y agoTo a first approximation, every nation subsidized their automotive manufacturers directly (government ownership, policies) and indirectly (contracts for building military vehicles, building highway systems and regulating the industry).
- mtdewcmu 10y agoGood old-fashioned government subsidies. I guess you can't overlook the US-automaker bailout under Obama as being part of this process.
- Arizhel 10y agoYep, if it weren't for that, GM would probably be out of business now. Too bad.