>"...Instead, the order requires only that [Rawls] produce his computer and hard drives in an unencrypted state." This language makes it sound like the governm

>"...Instead, the order requires only that [Rawls] produce his computer and hard drives in an unencrypted state." This language makes it sound like the government is specifically asking the defendant to take an affirmative action to produce the evidence required to incriminate himself. That would be the same thing as issuing an order with the intent to compel an accused murder to tell the police where the body is. I really don't understand how a court could issue an order based on such an argument.