4 ms·
...you just pasted the text from the ONE dissenting judge; the other EIGHT disagreed and ruled in the opposite. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1987/86-1753 https:/
by 2bitencryption 10y ago
...you just pasted the text from the ONE dissenting judge; the other EIGHT disagreed and ruled in the opposite.
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1987/86-1753 https://www.oyez.org/cases/1987/86-1753
- Programmatic 10y agoPer my other reply, the case he was dissenting about was not about being compelled to provide the combination for a lock. The dissent simply contained a supreme court judge's opinion regarding combination locks. If you can find actual caselaw for combination locks, I'll take it. Otherwise, I'll take the supreme court justice's opinion.
- MertsA 10y agoThe other eight unanimously agreed with him, they disagreed that the particular case was analogous to a combination, the other justices were of the opinion that it was really a "key".