4 ms·
I am well aware of what "dissent" means. Fortunately, this is a supreme court justice talking about a case that was not about a combination lock. Unless you can
by Programmatic 10y ago
I am well aware of what "dissent" means. Fortunately, this is a supreme court justice talking about a case that was not about a combination lock. Unless you can show something that says that you can be compelled to open a combination lock (I couldn't), I'll take the supreme court justice's word for it.
- vivekd 10y agoYou're right, combination locks are protected by 5th amendment as Testimonial evidence. I was wrong in my original post, however this doesn't apply to computer encryptions which the court seems to treat more like keys to a safe which are not protected, I'll correct my post accordingly thanks.
- MertsA 10y agoSo if I put a dial interface on my computer I can't be compelled to give up my "combination"?
- sean2 10y agoYou're combination is protected under the fifth, but you can be compelled to unlock your computer using that combination, which is exactly what the judge is ordering in this particular case. And don't complain too me that it's essentially the same thing; this is the judge's reasoning, not mine.