5 ms·
In many places, paying for sex is illegal. Paying to make a pornography video isn't. Could this be used to build the Uber for sex?
by RegulatoryRoger 10y ago
In many places, paying for sex is illegal. Paying to make a pornography video isn't. Could this be used to build the Uber for sex?
- sseveran 10y agoIn short...No. https://www.popehat.com/2016/11/06/private-porn-shoots-brilliant-no/ https://www.popehat.com/2016/11/06/private-porn-shoots-brill...
- mseebach 10y agoTL;DR: Very long and pretty offensive post that boils down to "because the courts aren't stupid and can probably tell the difference and by the way there are some specific legal requirement that when making porn you need to cross-reference IDs and you're probably not doing it".
- dfc 10y agoPretty offensive? What is it that you find so offensive about the post?
- edoceo 10y agoThe domain mocks the Pope's hat.
- mseebach 10y agoThe tone is pretty consistently contemptible towards the hypothetical asker, culminating in calling the asker "dumbass" and "imbicile".
- icebraining 10y agoIt's abrasive. It's only offensive if the hat fits.
- eganist 10y agoThis question is asked commonly enough that Popehat dedicated at least one post to explaining why the "porn exception" would flop: https://www.popehat.com/2016/11/06/private-porn-shoots-brilliant-no/ https://www.popehat.com/2016/11/06/private-porn-shoots-brill...
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]