3 ms·
I'm not sure that's censored, at least by Google, I think it's just bad data. The copyright at higher zooms is shown as NASA, which would have used Landsat. In
by Veratyr 10y ago
I'm not sure that's censored, at least by Google, I think it's just bad data. The copyright at higher zooms is shown as NASA, which would have used Landsat. In the Landsat archive, there are numerous satellite images for that region, though low quality: https://landsatlook.usgs.gov/viewer.html https://landsatlook.usgs.gov/viewer.html
Seems likely nobody at Google has taken the effort to do anything about it because who uses Google Maps to look at antarctica?
To those saying it's a military installation or SIGINT thing, I very very seriously doubt it. The Antarctic Treaty explicitly forbids military activity and an installation might be blockable by Google Maps but no one country has a monopoly on imaging satellites. It'd be seen and start a diplomatic shitstorm.
- yakshaving_jgt 10y agoSecret military installations in Antarctica is not unfathomable. You should read this: http://idlewords.com/2016/05/shuffleboard_at_mcmurdo.htm http://idlewords.com/2016/05/shuffleboard_at_mcmurdo.htm
- Cieplak 10y agoIt could also be a mine or refinery. In this interview, Admiral Byrd says there are significant coal, oil and Uranium deposits (skip to 7m30s): https://youtube.com/watch?v=czW0iRJuH1A https://youtube.com/watch?v=czW0iRJuH1A
- wbl 10y agoAnd where is the bulk or oil terminal? It's impossible to conceal that much shipping.
- unixhero 10y agoI love diplomatic shitstorms.