4 ms·

Those travelers would be violating their FaceBook ToS: "You will not share your password (or in the case of developers, your secret key), let anyone else acces

Those travelers would be violating their FaceBook ToS: "You will not share your password (or in the case of developers, your secret key), let anyone else access your account, or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account." [1] Perhaps this would give FaceBook the power to intervene and, well block their account or something. [1] https://www.facebook.com/terms https://www.facebook.com/terms

otterley 10y ago
Any term in contract that is contradictory to law is null and void. That's been in contract law since forever. The law always trumps contracts.
- DiabloD3 10y ago
  IANAL, but even though this is true, Facebook could still ban accounts for complying. They are a US company, and their TOS says they can ban an account for any reason or no reason at all. If they chose to ban anyone who shares passwords, even with the US government, even if they are Americans or not, they are within their rights as a US company to do so.
  - otterley 10y ago
    It's quite likely that any law promulgated to compel the production of passwords or any other authentication information would include language prohibiting a provider from terminating an account for complying with the law.
    - DiabloD3 10y ago
      Then they terminate the account for no reason at all.
      - otterley 10y ago
        They probably wouldn't, as it would create a huge hassle for them when the government starts investigating. Also, proximity in time to an event is admissible as evidence of intent.
  - deleted 10y ago
    [deleted]
  - deleted 10y ago
    [deleted]
- Hondor 10y ago
  Is it really law though, or just an option? Don't give your password and don't enter.