3 ms·
As I posted on last week's original submissions of this story: This is bogus. The new, higher readings are from areas never measured before[0]; levels are fall
by DrScump 10y ago
As I posted on last week's original submissions of this story:
This is bogus. The new, higher readings are from areas never measured before[0]; levels are falling consistently.
[0] http://blog.safecast.org/2017/02/no-radiation-levels-at-fukushima-daiichi-are-not-rising/ http://blog.safecast.org/2017/02/no-radiation-levels-at-fuku...