2 ms·
> The should probably a more complex IPC layer on top or beside it. Something like DBus with schemas, names, groups, broadcasts, etc because otherwise people wi
by wolfgke 10y ago
> The should probably a more complex IPC layer on top or beside it. Something like DBus with schemas, names, groups, broadcasts, etc because otherwise people will reinvent it poorly.
People also tend to reinvent stuff poorly that they consider as "bloated" or "unnecessarily complex for their use case". I just say C++ vs. Java (Java was indeed also marketed at the beginning that C++ is unnecessarily complex; besides the famous "write once, runs everywhere"), XML vs. JSON, CORBA vs. SOAP (no, please don't start a flame war which of these is the better one ;-) ).
- ethbro 10y agoI'd sum it up in terms of "standards bodies / enterprise would be perfectly happy if everything were ossified in a form that encompassed all possible use cases, regardless of complexity." Whereas reimplementation in a lighter weight protocol is usually the result of "devs don't want to deal with the above when it isn't needed for 80% of common use cases."