If a tree falls on your head it can't be "wrong", the tree has no agency. If a human cuts down the tree, knowing it is likely to fall on your head ... is who is

If a tree falls on your head it can't be "wrong", the tree has no agency. If a human cuts down the tree, knowing it is likely to fall on your head ... is who is responsible really important? Trees fall on heads all the time. What about important questions, like effective ways for others to prosper while some are crushed by the massive industry of human-felled / human-crushing trees? Whether we could or should stop felling trees onto people is a question beyond science or human judgement on which to opine. This sort of "climate trolley problem" is the final stage of pseudo-rational climate change denial, before it was "it isn't happening", now we're in a postmodernist semantic argument in the face of human destruction of our biosphere. How intellectual.