4 ms·
I don't work in NLP either, but from my understanding, the boundary between syntax and semantics is never as clean as one might imagine, and each language draws
by smallnamespace 10y ago
I don't work in NLP either, but from my understanding, the boundary between syntax and semantics is never as clean as one might imagine, and each language draws the boundary differently, so in general the utility of just looking at syntax can greatly vary.
Another issue is that many real life sentences have more than one possible parse, and we use context and semantics to disambiguate, e.g. how do you parse 'fruit flies like a banana'.
- mcguire 10y ago...vs. "time flies like an arrow." If you try to parse natural language with a strong distinction between syntax and semantics, you get a lot of ambiguous parses. Most current successful NLP work uses statistical models. (Don't mention those to Chomsky.)