3 ms·
Niemöller's statement comes to mind. I've seldom, if ever, been impressed by what I've seen from the Daily Mail. But does anybody honestly think that this ban
by MrZongle2 10y ago
Niemöller's statement comes to mind.
I've seldom, if ever, been impressed by what I've seen from the Daily Mail. But does anybody honestly think that this ban (which is what it is, despite the Wikimedia Foundation's semantic games and hand-waving) ends with that publication?
- laurex 10y agoThat's a valid point-- I wonder if that would be OK if there were in fact data to support the idea that a publication wasn't prone to be a factual reference?
- MrZongle2 10y agoI think such transparency would be great, especially if it were applied to all references. DM is almost certainly to fare poorly in such a situation, but such a framework would hopefully also call out the Jayson Blairs, Buzzfeeds or Dan Rathers, as the situation warrants.