> It's a simple case of letting the market decide who's got rare and valuable skills. With company-tied commitments, high transaction costs, lotteries, field o

> It's a simple case of letting the market decide who's got rare and valuable skills. With company-tied commitments, high transaction costs, lotteries, field of expertise limitations? Markets gone wild! > If you don't command an unusually high salary, your skills aren't that rare or aren't so essential to the company. This is a union-style wage argument. If the company would like to hire you below what the union makes, the company should not be able to and you would not qualify to work in this field.