2 ms·
I remember dreamweaver, and I have the mental scars to show from using it. However, dreamweaver came about in the time of table-based layout and refused to adap
by beaconstudios 10y ago
I remember dreamweaver, and I have the mental scars to show from using it. However, dreamweaver came about in the time of table-based layout and refused to adapt when the market consensus moved to div- (and later semantic element-) based layouts.
There's no reason that I can see, that you wouldn't be able to name the elements in a document (or ML could be perhaps used to auto-derive names), and beyond that, my understanding is that semantic markup (at least in terms of class/ID names) hasn't proven to be all that important since the advent of the API. Perhaps it's just not been done well enough so far to justify moving over from HTML/CSS, but you'd expect people to be jumping to solve their own issues. I for one find CSS/HTML tweaking to be pretty monotonous when I'm just trying to get to an end result.
- fusiongyro 10y agoI agree. I think the situation created the philosophy which we have today, but the situation has changed. It probably could be done better today, just either nobody's doing it, or it's not gained traction yet.