3 ms·
This supposedly has a set of qualities nothing else out there has. Namely its royalty free (excludes H.264) and is high quality (excludes Theora). If those two
by lftl 16y ago
This supposedly has a set of qualities nothing else out there has. Namely its royalty free (excludes H.264) and is high quality (excludes Theora).
If those two claims hold true, VP8 has significantly more value than the current options and should be the standard.
- jon_dahl 16y agoDefinitely. This is not "just another video codec" - it is significantly better than any other open source video codec. That's a big deal. And codecs are really really hard to create, for technical and legal reasons. It's not like 5 new production-ready video codecs come up every year. We might not see another credible open source codec for five years.
- hackermom 16y agoYou are entirely leaving out one very important factor when it comes to video, and that is the video quality itself. Do you really think any user out there except Richard Stallman will give a damned about the fact that the codec is royalty free when the end-result might look worse than what they are enjoying on the web now due to bandwidth constrains putting harsh limits on bitrates? The answer is of course that it won't matter at all to them - they'll just be annoyed.