4 ms·
To be fair, the premise of the story is that "Programming Doesn’t Require Talent or Even Passion", and I can confirm that I've met plenty of untalented and unpa
by Singletoned 10y ago
To be fair, the premise of the story is that "Programming Doesn’t Require Talent or Even Passion", and I can confirm that I've met plenty of untalented and unpassionate programmers.
Obviously the talented ones will outperform the untalented ones (pretty much by definition), but not everyone has to be great. There is a strange pressure in this industry, almost that if you aren't great, then you are failing. It's taken me 10 years to get comfortable with the fact that I'm never going to be a 'name' (ironically, despite my name).
There's plenty of room for mediocre people in this industry (not that I want to work with them, but there is plenty of work elsewhere for them to do).
- restalis 10y agoIf for some reason the goal is to stretch the term of "programming" then yes, there is plenty of room. I even remember a joke about programming being regarded as (plain) writing and the need for people that write faster. One could succeed with down-valuing the "programmer" title (for leverage on salary negotiation, perhaps?), but then we end up with this kind of problem: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13612992 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13612992 (on HN's 1st page at the time of this writing).