3 ms·
I was wondering about this same thing. Highest paid doesn't equate to highest skilled at all. The scheme seems more designed to punish companies from hiring im
by Benjamin_Dobell 10y ago
I was wondering about this same thing. Highest paid doesn't equate to highest skilled at all.
The scheme seems more designed to punish companies from hiring immigrants than actually ensuring only high quality employees make their way to Silicon Valley.
Admittedly, I think increasing the $60,000 figure seems reasonable. It should be set at a figure (and updated regularly enough) such that it's slightly above the average wage in the industry. That way it's really targeting skilled workers, as opposed to cheap workers.
- DanAndersen 10y ago>The scheme seems more designed to punish companies from hiring immigrants than actually ensuring only high quality employees make their way to Silicon Valley. I'd say you're exactly right (perhaps replace "punish" with "disincentivize" for more broad agreement), as concerns about the place of domestic labor in the face of foreign labor was the major campaign issue, rather than a desire on the part of the US electorate to refine/optimize the talent pool of Bay area international workers.