Really? Other than two sentences from an anonymous source, everything in the article is verifiable. The story itself is fairly opaque, but then that's what th

Really? Other than two sentences from an anonymous source, everything in the article is verifiable. The story itself is fairly opaque, but then that's what the article is reporting, that it isn't clear why the CISO left, and that neither the WH or the man himself will comment. They don't offer any guesses, and even the headline stresses that they don't know.