> Drepper takes a lot of flak for this, but glibc is not even remotely the only library at fault for this. The reason Drepper takes a lot of flak for this is n

> Drepper takes a lot of flak for this, but glibc is not even remotely the only library at fault for this. The reason Drepper takes a lot of flak for this is not because glibc constantly breaks ABI compatibility but because he set tone of dynamic linking discussions back in the day and he is responsible for static-linking-aversiness of glibc & GNU toolchain and pure dynamic linking culture of mainstream linux distributions. I agree with all of you've said, though.