3 ms·

I haven't tried vis, although it too looks like a pretty solid project. > I did try "vis" a while ago and it was alright but not quite there yet. And it was a

I haven't tried vis, although it too looks like a pretty solid project. > I did try "vis" a while ago and it was alright but not quite there yet. And it was a bit too "sickness" for my taste, e.g. requires shell scripts for completion to ":open". With regard to that particular issue, kak has a great fuzzy-finder. edit: It also apparently integrates with ranger, although I haven't tried that.

exDM69 10y ago
It works very well but is still work in progress. I appreciate that it's "just an editor" and not a half-assed IDE or an application framework. But I think they might have taken it a step too far.