5 ms·
That's really the problem. Sure, its cheap and they have great financial aid, but they don't pay for the tutors and the "life changing" experiences in Africa th
by aleeds 10y ago
That's really the problem. Sure, its cheap and they have great financial aid, but they don't pay for the tutors and the "life changing" experiences in Africa the rich kids have.
- SamReidHughes 10y agoThis just ain't reality. Most kids don't get in because they took a trip to Africa. Parents that pay a ton of money on making their kids the perfect college applicant generally get a bad deal and are a small minority.
- John23832 10y agoIt's not about paying to pad the application. There are legit methods of expanding your kid's world/mind. Those method generally cost more money than sitting in the house all summer watching tv.
- paulsmith34 10y agoPoor kids may not have a house to sit in and watch tv all day. They are at a major disadvantage and Ivies and other elite schools don't do a good job incorporating them into their schools due to their low sat scores and poor educational training, which is due to their poor socioeconomic status. You speak as if everyone is privileged and have the same opportunities but lazy.
- John23832 10y agoI think we were actually agreeing. My point was that money can convey an educational advantage.
- SamReidHughes 10y agoChild enrichment isn't limited to the wealthy. Kids join sports teams, boy scouts, church groups, etc, at all levels of society.
- John23832 10y agoAnd when everyone does those exact same things, nobody stands out (unless you lack those activities, in which case you are hurt). Look at what a high school degree has become... or what a bachelors is becoming. Truly standing out takes money and/or rare opportunity.
- SamReidHughes 10y agoThat's just not a reality-derived statement. All it takes is time.