3 ms·
This is the easiest thing in the world to game, so only innocent people would have their privacy violated. Criminals and other people with bad intent would main
by barrkel 10y ago
This is the easiest thing in the world to game, so only innocent people would have their privacy violated. Criminals and other people with bad intent would maintain a facade of normalcy.
Social media vetting has structurally the same argument as banning guns, BTW. If you ban guns, then only non-criminals will be without guns; if you require people's social media passwords, only non-criminals will be without privacy.