3 ms·
> Even if it means other impatient drivers are zooming around me. I have, however, been rear-ended twice since then. Wait, so you already saw someone be seriou
by erichocean 10y ago
> Even if it means other impatient drivers are zooming around me. I have, however, been rear-ended twice since then.
Wait, so you already saw someone be seriously injured, and since then, you've caused two other accidents (which are a danger to you too), and you're still going with "I'll drive the speed limit and not drive with the flow of traffic?"
smh
Drive with the flow of traffic: save lives.
- bluehawk 10y agoThat's a bold assumption about his accidents being his fault. Maybe he was rear ended at a light when fully stopped. And even if he was going slower than traffic, it's still the other driver's job not to hit other cars.
- Buge 10y agoIt's possible to increase accidents and save lives at the same time. If the average speed of accidents is greatly reduced, that could save lives.
- saiya-jin 10y agohate to deliver a personal message, but you ask for it: you are an idiot
- sctb 10y agoWe've already asked you many times to stop breaking the guidelines, so we've banned this account. We're happy to unban accounts if you email us at hn@ycombinator.com and commit to only posting civilly and substantively in the future. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- freehunter 10y agoThe first time I got rear-ended I was coming to a stop at a red light, the second time I was in the left-turn lane and came to a complete stop at the blinking red light. At no time was there any "flow of traffic" to speak of. The only way I caused those accidents was by not zooming through the light that was changing to red and not driving into the middle of the intersection on a blinking red light. It's not my fault other drivers don't expect me to follow the law.