4 ms·

It's not psychological: https://pavelfatin.com/images/typing/editor-latency-windows-text.png https://pavelfatin.com/images/typing/editor-latency-windows-... So

It's not psychological: https://pavelfatin.com/images/typing/editor-latency-windows-text.png https://pavelfatin.com/images/typing/editor-latency-windows-... Source: https://pavelfatin.com/typing-with-pleasure/ https://pavelfatin.com/typing-with-pleasure/

tukelully 10y ago
Wow. Significantly slower than the IDEs I used to think were bloated JVM beasts.
flukus 10y ago
Now I want to see the results from neovim, or anything with a client/server architecture. I'm surprised emacs is so slow (compared to vim) and I wonder if that explains it.
- ptrckbrwn 10y ago
  The author of the article I posted has the executable he used to test available if you want to try it yourself!
jfroma 10y ago
This is one of the reasons preventing me to switch from Sublime. The other reason is slowness to open a single file from the CLI, it seems Atom doesnt reuse the already open shell like sublime does, there was a tracked issue for that one.