3 ms·
Am i the only one, who get slowly angry about that "Use $language but Not this One"-comments? I don't see much value in such comments, srsly. Why don't accept
by darfs 10y ago
Am i the only one, who get slowly angry about that "Use $language but Not this One"-comments?
I don't see much value in such comments, srsly.
Why don't accept the fact someone decided to write $it, and move on with usefull comments?
Enough hn this today.
- davb 10y agoYes, I had a similar thought. The top two comment chains right now are (to paraphrase) "See, modern C++ isn't free of memory issues" and "Maybe we should rewrite it in Rust and compare".
- burntsushi 10y ago> "Maybe we should rewrite it in Rust and compare" That already happened, almost three years ago. It's an interesting comparison point. The OP contains memory corruption bugs in C++'s standard regex library. If Rust claims to prevent these kinds of bugs, does it actually hold up to scrutiny? One way of testing that is throwing a fuzzer against a regex library written in Rust.
- blub 10y agoBoost is not the "C++ standard regex library", it's one of the best known C++ libraries.
- Retra 10y agoWhat comment would you think is useful, and why not make that one instead?