> You'll miss out on less talent. This is assuming that the diverse candidates who actually have talent aren't being hired. That's the argument you need to be

> You'll miss out on less talent. This is assuming that the diverse candidates who actually have talent aren't being hired. That's the argument you need to be making > Your teams will be better at problem-solving if they have diverse backgrounds and outlooks If you want teams that are better at problem-solving, why don't you directly judge applicants based on their problem-solving abilities in a team environment instead of using diversity as a proxy for problem solving ability (which has not been proven at all)?