>I'm not sure I fully buy the "explainability" argument against deep learning since our goal is human level intelligence and human intelligence isn't easily exp

>I'm not sure I fully buy the "explainability" argument against deep learning since our goal is human level intelligence and human intelligence isn't easily explained either. There are two types of explainability. One is explaining why the system converges on correct solutions in general. Another is explaining why a particular decision was made the way it was made. Human intelligence is usually very much explainable in the second sense. This is not always true, but such cases are called "intuition" and we tends not to trust such judgements for mission-critical tasks.