4 ms·
so I ran this test using the linux source code. I warmed everything to prevent caching/buffering advantages. For loc the best time was: 55.425s and the worst w
by dcu 10y ago
so I ran this test using the linux source code. I warmed everything to prevent caching/buffering advantages.
For loc the best time was: 55.425s and the worst was: 1m30.557s
For loccount the best time was: 42.345s and the worst was: 56.396s
loc supports more languages but I also believe it has more false positives. loc reporting seems nicer as well.
- j1f4 10y agoPass the release flag when you build loc; `cargo build --release`. I see ~5 seconds for loc and ~34 seconds for loccount to count a freshly cloned linux repository. edit: woops, that was user time. These both spin all the cores. loc takes ~0.7 secs and loccount ~6.6 secs real time.
- dcu 10y agoI'm not seeing any changes in my results. I'm testing in an old laptop, I guess that's why it's so slow. My rustc version is 1.15.0 and go 1.8.