4 ms·

They are not the prime ministers now. The context that we are talking here is about the current govt. If the previous govts had lots of wrong doers then it does

They are not the prime ministers now. The context that we are talking here is about the current govt. If the previous govts had lots of wrong doers then it doesnt mean the current govt doing the same is okay. Get your priorities straight.

alokyadav15 10y ago
> If the previous govts had lots of wrong doers then it doesnt mean the current govt doing the same is okay . Supreme court of India gave clean chit to Modi [0]. second here context is Indian Politicians not current Indian govt. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Narendra-Modi-gets-clean-chit-in-SIT-report-on-Gujarat-riots-Zakia-Jafri-vows-to-continue-her-fight/articleshow/12612345.cms http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Narendra-Modi-gets-...
- andrewvijay 10y ago
  dude. Im not even saying he is guilty here!! Why are you so insecure? Im just stating what had happened. I really dont give a shit about modi to care about him or his acts. You started typing without even reading the comment?
  - dang 10y ago
    We've banned this account for repeated incivility.
rameshdsouza 10y ago
Using the same argument - we shouldn't discredit those crimes and criminals just because they are not prime ministers or chief ministers now. Get your priorities right.
- andrewvijay 10y ago
  Im not discrediting them. WHy are you a couple of guys here defending against no offence here? :D Its really funny to see you bringing up random things wildly out of context here. Stop embarrassing yourself man! The topic was about criminals and I have stated some facts related to the current govt. There are no accusations here. Your insecurity is showing when you vehemently defend against something that was not even said. Any comments on this would not be entertained anymore. I have a life man.
  - adictator 10y ago
    > facts Last time I checked the meaning of "facts", it meant something else entirely!
- rameshdsouza 10y ago
  @andrewvijay, It's really funny that you keep showing your insecurity and selective bias, by pushing your propaganda. Get a life man.
  - deleted 10y ago
    [deleted]
  - dang 10y ago
    We've banned this account for violating the HN guidelines. Please don't create HN accounts to do that.

alokyadav15 10y ago

> If the previous govts had lots of wrong doers then it doesnt mean the current govt doing the same is okay . Supreme court of India gave clean chit to Modi [0]. second here context is Indian Politicians not current Indian govt. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Narendra-Modi-gets-clean-chit-in-SIT-report-on-Gujarat-riots-Zakia-Jafri-vows-to-continue-her-fight/articleshow/12612345.cms http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Narendra-Modi-gets-...

andrewvijay 10y ago
dude. Im not even saying he is guilty here!! Why are you so insecure? Im just stating what had happened. I really dont give a shit about modi to care about him or his acts. You started typing without even reading the comment?
- dang 10y ago
  We've banned this account for repeated incivility.

rameshdsouza 10y ago

Using the same argument - we shouldn't discredit those crimes and criminals just because they are not prime ministers or chief ministers now. Get your priorities right.

andrewvijay 10y ago
Im not discrediting them. WHy are you a couple of guys here defending against no offence here? :D Its really funny to see you bringing up random things wildly out of context here. Stop embarrassing yourself man! The topic was about criminals and I have stated some facts related to the current govt. There are no accusations here. Your insecurity is showing when you vehemently defend against something that was not even said. Any comments on this would not be entertained anymore. I have a life man.
- adictator 10y ago
  > facts Last time I checked the meaning of "facts", it meant something else entirely!
rameshdsouza 10y ago
@andrewvijay, It's really funny that you keep showing your insecurity and selective bias, by pushing your propaganda. Get a life man.
- deleted 10y ago
  [deleted]
- dang 10y ago
  We've banned this account for violating the HN guidelines. Please don't create HN accounts to do that.