4 ms·
What about 1948,1986,1992,2013... Riots , why always whining about Gujrat or you think that only in gujrat riots politicians were involved ?
by alokyadav15 10y ago
What about 1948,1986,1992,2013... Riots , why always whining about Gujrat or you think that only in gujrat riots politicians were involved ?
- andrewvijay 10y agoThey are not the prime ministers now. The context that we are talking here is about the current govt. If the previous govts had lots of wrong doers then it doesnt mean the current govt doing the same is okay. Get your priorities straight.
- alokyadav15 10y ago> If the previous govts had lots of wrong doers then it doesnt mean the current govt doing the same is okay . Supreme court of India gave clean chit to Modi [0]. second here context is Indian Politicians not current Indian govt. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Narendra-Modi-gets-clean-chit-in-SIT-report-on-Gujarat-riots-Zakia-Jafri-vows-to-continue-her-fight/articleshow/12612345.cms http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Narendra-Modi-gets-...
- andrewvijay 10y agodude. Im not even saying he is guilty here!! Why are you so insecure? Im just stating what had happened. I really dont give a shit about modi to care about him or his acts. You started typing without even reading the comment?
- dang 10y agoWe've banned this account for repeated incivility.
- rameshdsouza 10y agoUsing the same argument - we shouldn't discredit those crimes and criminals just because they are not prime ministers or chief ministers now. Get your priorities right.
- andrewvijay 10y agoIm not discrediting them. WHy are you a couple of guys here defending against no offence here? :D Its really funny to see you bringing up random things wildly out of context here. Stop embarrassing yourself man! The topic was about criminals and I have stated some facts related to the current govt. There are no accusations here. Your insecurity is showing when you vehemently defend against something that was not even said. Any comments on this would not be entertained anymore. I have a life man.
- adictator 10y ago> facts Last time I checked the meaning of "facts", it meant something else entirely!
- rameshdsouza 10y ago@andrewvijay, It's really funny that you keep showing your insecurity and selective bias, by pushing your propaganda. Get a life man.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- dang 10y agoWe've banned this account for violating the HN guidelines. Please don't create HN accounts to do that.
- rameshdsouza 10y agoHe's pushing his propaganda on HN, that's all ;)
- andrewvijay 10y agoPropaganda? What propaganda do you see here exactly? Your relentless support to the govt when the topic is about the criminals in the govt is really disgusting dude! I dont know if you just created a profile just to comment here. Wont be surprised!
- somedangedname 10y agoIs there an Indian equivalent of the 50 Cent Party? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent_Party https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent_Party
- andrewvijay 10y agoOh yes! The BJP, which is the ruling party is famous for this very same thing. A lot of trending topics in support of this party is done by paid twitter trends and they are famous for abusing journalists and the left with rape and death threats continuously!
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- helloindia 10y agoWith your logic, since politicians are always involved in Riots, it's ok that Modi was also involved in Gujarat Riots?
- alokyadav15 10y agoof course not , I mentioned those riots because biased view of andrewvijay , where riots means gujrat and criminal means modi.