6 ms·

I'm an Indian and can verify that. A lot of scumbags keep winning and hold onto power here usually by hook or crook. In fact even the prime Minister modi was on

I'm an Indian and can verify that. A lot of scumbags keep winning and hold onto power here usually by hook or crook. In fact even the prime Minister modi was on a mass murdering case of Gujarat 2002. He was the chief minister when the riots Happened!! That guy has still not even apologized or said sorry to the families whose people were killed. The current govt has the largest share of criminals in power. There are some honest players coming up. We'll see if they are really honest in a few years.

adictator 10y ago
> In fact even the prime Minister modi was on a mass murdering case of Gujarat 2002. He was the chief minister when the riots Happened!! That guy has still not even apologized or said sorry to the families whose people were killed. I think you should stop whatever you are doing and get appointed as a judge in the Supreme Court of India. Obviously you know so much more than what they know or have deduced about criminals in India, much less the PM.
- andrewvijay 10y ago
  did you not read the word 'was' ? Im not saying he is a mass murderer. Im only saying he was on the case for long. Your insecurity about this only makes me even more suspicious.
  - yogesha 10y ago
    Then why should he say sorry?
    - andrewvijay 10y ago
      Responsibility.
      - adictator 10y ago
        If he said "Sorry" the scumbags would say "See, he said 'Sorry', obviously he's guilty", if he does not say "Sorry", the remaining scumbags say "He did not even say 'Sorry', he needs to take responsibility"! If you think people can't see through such antics as you're playing, you are really deluded & grossly underestimate the general intelligence of humans!
    - alokyadav15 10y ago
      for " political correctness " .
  - deleted 10y ago
    [deleted]
  - adictator 10y ago
    WTF man! Just because people do not agree with you, they become "insecure"? Unless you have been living under a rock or deep inside a cave you should know that almost every political party in India as well as many international NGO's, including our very own Hillary Clinton were out to "Get Modi". There were at least two Special Task Forces (STFs) that said there is no evidence of Modi being involved in the killings. He was the CM at that time, that was his only fault. The Courts in India have given him a clean chit, this was when he was a mere CM, at a time when the Congress party was in power. I mean, you got be really dense... And what's with the 'was'? Just because you claim someone "was" a mass murderer, you can absolve yourself when every known & serious inquiry against him proves otherwise? Please try to be objective & analytical. Look up facts. Just because you like things to be a certain way does not make it so. Try to understand the divisive politic people play, but their best hands couldn't prove what was false. I meant it seriously - if anyone can prove that he is guilty, go and make your case. Stop being a keyboard warrior!!
- mu1ex 10y ago
  That'll be tough mate. Judiciary in India is another corrupt system, where only money works.
- WhitneyLand 10y ago
  What's with your negative and sarcastic response to a commenter who actually cares about a serious situation? If something he said was untrue or misleading, please cite facts or refute so we can be in on the joke.
  - adictator 10y ago
    The commenter is deluded and does not care for facts. This case has been running in prime coverage for the last 10-12 years because almost everybody took an interest in it, because they wanted to "Get Modi". Many inquiries were setup, including special task forces, commissions, many US & European based NGO's in the guise of missionaries came to India searching for mass graves, he was banned from getting a Visa to enter the US, the supreme court in India held multiple hearings etc. After all that, he was deemed innocent. This shows that there is plausible evidence that the commenter was not serious, & in fact a troll or he was absolutely clueless, yet does not & cannot resist from accusing someone of being a "mass murderer". So there, that's the joke! You can't get more serious than that about this situation.
    - WhitneyLand 10y ago
      Thank you for providing the context that is helpful. However a quick skim of content seems to suggest that a significant amount of people do not have confidence in the impartiality of the investigations, and that it remains a controversial issue.
      - adictator 10y ago
        >a significant amount of people do not have confidence in the impartiality of the investigations Generally, you would be right in assuming that. But in this case, Modi was in quite a vulnerable situation, when the primary opposition party (Congress) was in power in the central government at that time; they even had CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation) in their control, there were too many international parties out to dig up evidence and accuse him (which they did, sans evidence). But at the end, not one charge stood up. In other words, he was proven innocent multiple times against all odds. The Visa ban was also overturned without a whimper, in fact Modi & Obama became such good friends....
NotACongitard 10y ago
Oh! We've an honest person here. Who are those honest players coming up? Hope it's not 'pseudos' like Kejriwal. Also, you should get appointed as a Supreme Court Judge ASAP.
rameshdsouza 10y ago
Yes. Few scumbags from a family had been holding the helm in India. Fortunately, their next generation is a bit retard, hopefully they'll weed out.
- andrewvijay 10y ago
  Yeah the congress has to be gone for good. Also the current govt! They have the highest no of criminals in the parliament now. Its not even up for debate. They need to be weeded out.
alokyadav15 10y ago
What about 1948,1986,1992,2013... Riots , why always whining about Gujrat or you think that only in gujrat riots politicians were involved ?
- andrewvijay 10y ago
  They are not the prime ministers now. The context that we are talking here is about the current govt. If the previous govts had lots of wrong doers then it doesnt mean the current govt doing the same is okay. Get your priorities straight.
  - alokyadav15 10y ago
    > If the previous govts had lots of wrong doers then it doesnt mean the current govt doing the same is okay . Supreme court of India gave clean chit to Modi [0]. second here context is Indian Politicians not current Indian govt. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Narendra-Modi-gets-clean-chit-in-SIT-report-on-Gujarat-riots-Zakia-Jafri-vows-to-continue-her-fight/articleshow/12612345.cms http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Narendra-Modi-gets-...
    - andrewvijay 10y ago
      dude. Im not even saying he is guilty here!! Why are you so insecure? Im just stating what had happened. I really dont give a shit about modi to care about him or his acts. You started typing without even reading the comment?
      - dang 10y ago
        We've banned this account for repeated incivility.
  - rameshdsouza 10y ago
    Using the same argument - we shouldn't discredit those crimes and criminals just because they are not prime ministers or chief ministers now. Get your priorities right.
guru110 10y ago
I dont know why such scumbags expect an apology from Modi. Supreme Court gave him clean chit. I am from Ahmedabad and whenever I see the reference of 2002 riots, I know its from ignorant people outside of Gujarat and who doesnt know anything about Godhara incident. He did what he could as a CM, only outsiders (non-gujjus) still find he is the one should be blamed. What a pitty! 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godhra_train_burning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godhra_train_burning
- andrewvijay 10y ago
  Because its the basic responsibility of a chief minister to be accountable for the violence that happened as the law and order is under him. I know its very wrong to expect apologies from barbaric cunts.
- adictator 10y ago
  > scumbags Key operative word.
sanjayts 10y ago
> The current govt has the largest share of criminals in power Surely you jest? No mention of Congress who have literally destroyed our country by their rampant corruption and being in power for so long that it is proving to be a gargantuan task to get back on our feet?

adictator 10y ago

> In fact even the prime Minister modi was on a mass murdering case of Gujarat 2002. He was the chief minister when the riots Happened!! That guy has still not even apologized or said sorry to the families whose people were killed. I think you should stop whatever you are doing and get appointed as a judge in the Supreme Court of India. Obviously you know so much more than what they know or have deduced about criminals in India, much less the PM.

andrewvijay 10y ago
did you not read the word 'was' ? Im not saying he is a mass murderer. Im only saying he was on the case for long. Your insecurity about this only makes me even more suspicious.
- yogesha 10y ago
  Then why should he say sorry?
  - andrewvijay 10y ago
    Responsibility.
    - adictator 10y ago
      If he said "Sorry" the scumbags would say "See, he said 'Sorry', obviously he's guilty", if he does not say "Sorry", the remaining scumbags say "He did not even say 'Sorry', he needs to take responsibility"! If you think people can't see through such antics as you're playing, you are really deluded & grossly underestimate the general intelligence of humans!
  - alokyadav15 10y ago
    for " political correctness " .
- deleted 10y ago
  [deleted]
- adictator 10y ago
  WTF man! Just because people do not agree with you, they become "insecure"? Unless you have been living under a rock or deep inside a cave you should know that almost every political party in India as well as many international NGO's, including our very own Hillary Clinton were out to "Get Modi". There were at least two Special Task Forces (STFs) that said there is no evidence of Modi being involved in the killings. He was the CM at that time, that was his only fault. The Courts in India have given him a clean chit, this was when he was a mere CM, at a time when the Congress party was in power. I mean, you got be really dense... And what's with the 'was'? Just because you claim someone "was" a mass murderer, you can absolve yourself when every known & serious inquiry against him proves otherwise? Please try to be objective & analytical. Look up facts. Just because you like things to be a certain way does not make it so. Try to understand the divisive politic people play, but their best hands couldn't prove what was false. I meant it seriously - if anyone can prove that he is guilty, go and make your case. Stop being a keyboard warrior!!
mu1ex 10y ago
That'll be tough mate. Judiciary in India is another corrupt system, where only money works.
WhitneyLand 10y ago
What's with your negative and sarcastic response to a commenter who actually cares about a serious situation? If something he said was untrue or misleading, please cite facts or refute so we can be in on the joke.
- adictator 10y ago
  The commenter is deluded and does not care for facts. This case has been running in prime coverage for the last 10-12 years because almost everybody took an interest in it, because they wanted to "Get Modi". Many inquiries were setup, including special task forces, commissions, many US & European based NGO's in the guise of missionaries came to India searching for mass graves, he was banned from getting a Visa to enter the US, the supreme court in India held multiple hearings etc. After all that, he was deemed innocent. This shows that there is plausible evidence that the commenter was not serious, & in fact a troll or he was absolutely clueless, yet does not & cannot resist from accusing someone of being a "mass murderer". So there, that's the joke! You can't get more serious than that about this situation.
  - WhitneyLand 10y ago
    Thank you for providing the context that is helpful. However a quick skim of content seems to suggest that a significant amount of people do not have confidence in the impartiality of the investigations, and that it remains a controversial issue.
    - adictator 10y ago
      >a significant amount of people do not have confidence in the impartiality of the investigations Generally, you would be right in assuming that. But in this case, Modi was in quite a vulnerable situation, when the primary opposition party (Congress) was in power in the central government at that time; they even had CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation) in their control, there were too many international parties out to dig up evidence and accuse him (which they did, sans evidence). But at the end, not one charge stood up. In other words, he was proven innocent multiple times against all odds. The Visa ban was also overturned without a whimper, in fact Modi & Obama became such good friends....

NotACongitard 10y ago

Oh! We've an honest person here. Who are those honest players coming up? Hope it's not 'pseudos' like Kejriwal. Also, you should get appointed as a Supreme Court Judge ASAP.

rameshdsouza 10y ago

Yes. Few scumbags from a family had been holding the helm in India. Fortunately, their next generation is a bit retard, hopefully they'll weed out.

andrewvijay 10y ago
Yeah the congress has to be gone for good. Also the current govt! They have the highest no of criminals in the parliament now. Its not even up for debate. They need to be weeded out.

alokyadav15 10y ago

What about 1948,1986,1992,2013... Riots , why always whining about Gujrat or you think that only in gujrat riots politicians were involved ?

andrewvijay 10y ago
They are not the prime ministers now. The context that we are talking here is about the current govt. If the previous govts had lots of wrong doers then it doesnt mean the current govt doing the same is okay. Get your priorities straight.
- alokyadav15 10y ago
  > If the previous govts had lots of wrong doers then it doesnt mean the current govt doing the same is okay . Supreme court of India gave clean chit to Modi [0]. second here context is Indian Politicians not current Indian govt. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Narendra-Modi-gets-clean-chit-in-SIT-report-on-Gujarat-riots-Zakia-Jafri-vows-to-continue-her-fight/articleshow/12612345.cms http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Narendra-Modi-gets-...
  - andrewvijay 10y ago
    dude. Im not even saying he is guilty here!! Why are you so insecure? Im just stating what had happened. I really dont give a shit about modi to care about him or his acts. You started typing without even reading the comment?
    - dang 10y ago
      We've banned this account for repeated incivility.
- rameshdsouza 10y ago
  Using the same argument - we shouldn't discredit those crimes and criminals just because they are not prime ministers or chief ministers now. Get your priorities right.

guru110 10y ago

I dont know why such scumbags expect an apology from Modi. Supreme Court gave him clean chit. I am from Ahmedabad and whenever I see the reference of 2002 riots, I know its from ignorant people outside of Gujarat and who doesnt know anything about Godhara incident. He did what he could as a CM, only outsiders (non-gujjus) still find he is the one should be blamed. What a pitty! 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godhra_train_burning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godhra_train_burning

andrewvijay 10y ago
Because its the basic responsibility of a chief minister to be accountable for the violence that happened as the law and order is under him. I know its very wrong to expect apologies from barbaric cunts.
adictator 10y ago
> scumbags Key operative word.

sanjayts 10y ago

> The current govt has the largest share of criminals in power Surely you jest? No mention of Congress who have literally destroyed our country by their rampant corruption and being in power for so long that it is proving to be a gargantuan task to get back on our feet?