3 ms·
Vulkan is a horrible choice for a web standard. Their hardware support is abysmal, the only graphics hardware that supports it was made from 2012 on wards. Even
by pippy 10y ago
Vulkan is a horrible choice for a web standard. Their hardware support is abysmal, the only graphics hardware that supports it was made from 2012 on wards. Even then a decent chunk of the support is experimental: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulkan_(API) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulkan_(API)
Vulkan is great, but you need to think about the cross compatibility of the web.
- oblio 10y agoWe're talking about a web standard. Something that will take 5+ years to be implemented fully on all platforms, and even then might still be behind feature flags. If Vulkan took this long to adopt partially, how long do you think a new 3D + Web standard will actually take? My money's in 10 years.