3 ms·
From the longer (paywalled) version: "Over a fifth of its population lives below the poverty line. The scheme outlined this week by the chief economic adviser
by f_allwein 10y ago
From the longer (paywalled) version:
"Over a fifth of its population lives below the poverty line. The scheme outlined this week by the chief economic adviser to the Indian government, Arvind Subramanian, would cut that figure to less than 0.5% by transferring about $9 a month to all adult Indians. If doled out to everyone, that would cost around 6-7% of GDP; the 950 welfare schemes soak up 5% of GDP." http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21716027-india-should-replace-its-thicket-welfare-payments-single-payment-india-debates-case?fsrc=rss%7Clea http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21716027-india-should-...
Fascinating as few people probably would have thought UBI would be remotely feasible in a country of 1.3B people. Yet there is also massive inequality, as well as corruption and inefficiency in handling all the various aid programmes. Plus the country has Aadhaar, a digital-identification scheme that covers 99% of adults.
Probably still not feasible for now, but interesting to see how relatively cheap it would be to lift so many people out of poverty.
- ouid 10y agoThis is only tangentially related, but I remember there was a problem some time ago where India simply did not have the infrastructure to count all of its citizens. How is Aadhaar sure of its 99% figure?
- nickpeterson 10y agoI guess I don't grasp how this will prevent companies from raising prices to capture some of that 9 dollars, effectively making the wealthy even wealthier.