4 ms·
No, I'm pretty sure he doesn't, and dogecoinbase should be embarrassed for claiming that he does and that that's his motivation for Urbit. From his personal st
by dri_ft 10y ago
No, I'm pretty sure he doesn't, and dogecoinbase should be embarrassed for claiming that he does and that that's his motivation for Urbit.
From his personal statement about lambdaconf, at http://degoes.net/articles/lambdaconf-inclusion http://degoes.net/articles/lambdaconf-inclusion :
> Politics of any sort is out of scope at a functional programming conference. I pledge to treat other LambdaConf guests as if they were colleagues at a large company or fellow students at a university, and neither utter nor show any content that’s out of scope or otherwise disturbing. My pen name has been “doxed,” but professionally I behave as if it was a secret.
- dogecoinbase 10y agoI didn't claim that was his motivation, I claimed it was the practical outcome of urbit, and it is. His presence prevented a great many people from attending lambdaconf because they had a legitimate fear of the racist violence he advocates, and refuses to recant. You'd have to work a lot harder apologizing for fascist bigots to make me feel any embarrassment for calling out their negative impact on communities I care about. Claiming politics is out of scope is absurd, and is a rhetorical mechanism designed to, at a minimum, preserve the status quo. His politics are abhorrent -- accepting his declaration of them as irrelevant when they're anything but is effectively siding with them.
- SamReidHughes 10y agoWhat racist violence does he advocate?
- davidgerard 10y agoThat blacks are ideally suited to being slaves. His advocacy of this is exceedingly well documented. (You might argue that this isn't technically violence in itself, but it's hard to argue it's not an explicit endorsement of a system of violence.)
- tnones 10y agoMost of the criticism of Yarvin is by those unable to distinguish between descriptive and normative ideas. His writing is a giant "what if" that mainly rejects the provincial notion that only today's common views are the most sound. I'd bet that the adjacent commenter's idea of "[his racist advocacy] is well documented" comes from Twitter and Tumblr quotes taken out of context, cyclically retweeted in outrage.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]