3 ms·
These 2 things aren't the same at all. The article is talking about tweets being excluded from search results and users being banned from creating additional ac
by dkonofalski 10y ago
These 2 things aren't the same at all. The article is talking about tweets being excluded from search results and users being banned from creating additional accounts. Adams is talking about tweets being censored by claiming that they're unavailable when they are. He wasn't talking about either a search or a specific user being banned, only tweets being censored.
- sverige 10y agoFrom TFA: "The video describes how Twitter gives a fake message that some tweets are no longer available, to discourage you from clicking to them. The tweets still exist, and you can access them by directly clicking the links in the tweets, but most people would not think to do that." From the article I quoted: "Twitter is also making some replies less visible so only the most relevant conversations surface." Sounds like the same thing to me.
- dkonofalski 10y agoWay to cherry pick. The article you quoted is talking about search results. That's exactly what I said in my reply to you. You're pretending like they're the same thing when they're not.
- sverige 10y agoYou probably won't see this, but Scott Adams and I are not the only ones to notice this. Stay on the right side of the narrative, though; you wouldn't want to run afoul of the powers that be. https://freedomandfulfilment.com/twitter-censorship-free-speech/ https://freedomandfulfilment.com/twitter-censorship-free-spe...