> So how come they didn't manage to have the same idea for touch events? I have no clue. You'd have to ask them. But they have had this idea for WebGPU. If you

> So how come they didn't manage to have the same idea for touch events? I have no clue. You'd have to ask them. But they have had this idea for WebGPU. If you think it's better than what they did for touch events, let's hope you approach it with an open mind and-... > I'd say design and its roots matter. If they base it off Metal, and use Metal like technology, while Metal itself remains a closed Apple only API, then W3C should reject it. ...No, you're just going to get mad about a hypothetical.