4 ms·
> That is, software you are free to modify, change or use, without restriction The FSF has a different definition of "free software". They don't want you to g
by adekok 10y ago
> That is, software you are free to modify, change or use, without restriction
The FSF has a different definition of "free software". They don't want you to get software for free, and then modify it, turn around and restrict it's distribution for other people.
> there are also people, like me, who care about free software, and think that the GPL harms the community and actively discourages community contributions.
The only proof you've shown is that people like you don't like the GPL. That's all well and good as a personal opinion, but it doesn't show that the GPL harms the community or actively discourages community contributions.
- dllthomas 10y ago> The FSF has a different definition of "free software". They don't want you to get software for free, and then modify it, turn around and restrict it's distribution for other people. They don't want you to do that, but their definition of "free software" doesn't exclude licenses that allow it.