5 ms·
It is irrelevant how famous he is... if he doesn't have evidence to back up his claim then he is a source to dismiss. In fact, when considering the truth of any
by splawn 10y ago
It is irrelevant how famous he is... if he doesn't have evidence to back up his claim then he is a source to dismiss. In fact, when considering the truth of anything that is my main criteria. Im curious what yours must be.
- sremani 10y agoHis fame matters because he has lot more twitter followers and each tweet has massive feedback in likes etc. a variety data-set than for example me (with 4 followers). That is where I am coming from. The uppity in your post, as if you are the only priest of Truth is confirming what I already suspected.
- splawn 10y agoOh? so he knows how twitter's algo works? cool...