5 ms·
>"Modern left" leaning groups are so easy to disrupt and destroy it is child's play. That raises the question, whose fault is it? If people are so sensitive th
by Kenji 10y ago
>"Modern left" leaning groups are so easy to disrupt and destroy it is child's play.
That raises the question, whose fault is it? If people are so sensitive that they get spooked by halloween masks and triggered by witty remarks, does the world around them have to change, or do they have to change?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- mejari 10y agoI don't think it raises any questions about strawmen descriptors of the "modern left" at all. The pearl-clutching over "ess jay doublyous" far outweigh any impact they have in real life.
- qwertyuiop924 10y agoFor the most part, they're more annoying than anything else. But wow, are they annoying.
- breatheoften 10y agoWhich one is annoying -- the SJWs or the pearl clutchers?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- WildUtah 10y agoA few people lose their jobs as authorities try to placate the SJWs and the chilling effect over the whole society is palpable. Ask Brendan Eich or the leaders of that University in Missouri or the guy who made an innocent dongle joke at a conference. People remember that kind of thing and millions edit themselves in a general low-level miasma of fear they might get targeted.
- alva 10y agoIm not sure what the answer to that question is. What appears to be the case is that if certain movements at their core significant weight on identifying/separating groups of people, especially based on grievance, it will inevitably split. A group that bases itself on division, will inevitably divide and weaken.