I think you're missing the point. A significant proportion of the mentions in here and the last one were about major laying offs. When you have to lose >10% o

I think you're missing the point. A significant proportion of the mentions in here and the last one were about major laying offs. When you have to lose >10% of your staff, you probably shouldn't blame the employees. This is just an interesting counter-post to the "Who's Hiring", allowing people to see both sides of the coin.