4 ms·

> They don't because they're the claims of a crazy person That is your opinion. Others disagree. For the record: I agree with you. But these are our OPINIONS.

> They don't because they're the claims of a crazy person That is your opinion. Others disagree. For the record: I agree with you. But these are our OPINIONS. Others see a successful artist, pundit, investor, and multimillionaire. > When this was pointed out to you, instead of looking into it you were rude (citation needed!). I wanted to know where the Fact of the statement came from. Specifically, the fact that OP claimed Hillary Clinton was going to kill him. > declaring yourself some arbiter of intellectual honesty I never once did this. I did call you out for being dishonest and if that makes me an arbiter of intellectual honesty then so be it. And then you started name calling which was really classy :)

pvg 10y ago
No, that's a fact but even if you call it an opinion you share how can the nonsense he spouts possibly give credence to notions of twitter censorship? That makes no sense at all. Or is intellectually dishonest, if you prefer. The only explanation I can think of is you didn't know who Scott Adams was or didn't notice the verbiage came from him and then decided to be an ass about it. And I'm sorry, calling people liars and [citation needed] is so far off the classy path that you should not be surprised others follow you into the weeds. You were wrong then rude then insulting :)
- devopsproject 10y ago
  There is a reason someone might say "What is your opinion on Scott Adams?" instead of "What is your facts about Scott Adams?" (hint: opinion != facts) The notion of censorship exists because it happens. Facebook admitted doing it. But I suppose this is another fact you will confuse with an opinion. And I truly apologize if my "[citation needed]" offended your delicate sensibilities. I thought I was dealing with an adult but your emotional outbursts and insistence that opinions are facts prove you still have a ways to go. A long ways. Good luck!

pvg 10y ago

No, that's a fact but even if you call it an opinion you share how can the nonsense he spouts possibly give credence to notions of twitter censorship? That makes no sense at all. Or is intellectually dishonest, if you prefer. The only explanation I can think of is you didn't know who Scott Adams was or didn't notice the verbiage came from him and then decided to be an ass about it. And I'm sorry, calling people liars and [citation needed] is so far off the classy path that you should not be surprised others follow you into the weeds. You were wrong then rude then insulting :)

devopsproject 10y ago
There is a reason someone might say "What is your opinion on Scott Adams?" instead of "What is your facts about Scott Adams?" (hint: opinion != facts) The notion of censorship exists because it happens. Facebook admitted doing it. But I suppose this is another fact you will confuse with an opinion. And I truly apologize if my "[citation needed]" offended your delicate sensibilities. I thought I was dealing with an adult but your emotional outbursts and insistence that opinions are facts prove you still have a ways to go. A long ways. Good luck!