3 ms·
Definitely. We have lots of ongoing efforts. (Not necessarily moving to a different Ruby implementation, though) You can take a look at an overview of our effo
by cmatija 10y ago
Definitely. We have lots of ongoing efforts. (Not necessarily moving to a different Ruby implementation, though)
You can take a look at an overview of our efforts here:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/infrastructure/issues/947 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/infrastructure/issues/947
- jeffbachtel 10y agoDoes GitLab have any plans to implement a git server that does not rely on POSIX filesystem semantics and gets away from the need for NFS? It seems like a git server storing objects in an object store would allow the GitLab SaaS to scale out better.
- northrup 10y agoGitLab does have a plan to try and mitigate the bulk of pain generated from hosting lots of git repositories against a POSIX based filesystem by abstracting a layer of caching functionality and horizontal scaling. This project is called Gitaly[0] and is being tracked on GitLab.com [0] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly