Two points of contention I have with your point that wireless has less latency than optical glass: 1) You don't operate wireless in a vacuum. There's all kinds

Two points of contention I have with your point that wireless has less latency than optical glass: 1) You don't operate wireless in a vacuum. There's all kinds of potential obstructions to the signal, including any physical objects 2) Even if wireless as a medium itself has less latency, it requires far more relay points to travel comparable distances to fiber, which introduces far more latency than the medium itself