3 ms·
Worth a read for some background on this: http://www.popsci.com.au/science/the-house-science-committee-claims-scientists-faked-climate-change-data8212heres-wha
by gravelc 10y ago
Worth a read for some background on this:
http://www.popsci.com.au/science/the-house-science-committee-claims-scientists-faked-climate-change-data8212heres-what-you-should-know,450206 http://www.popsci.com.au/science/the-house-science-committee...
- tangue 10y ago"The source of their evidence, according to Committee spokesperson Thea McDonalds, was a Daily Mail article." This is not politics, this is trolling and it takes trolling to a whole new level. It feels as if the wildests redditors are in charge in the US.
- mcguire 10y ago"Zeke Hausfather at Berkeley Earth independently developed an updated version of Figure 2 in Karl et al 2015. The black line shows the new NOAA record, while the thinner blue line shows the results from raw land stations, ships, and buoys with no corrections for station moves or instrument changes. The two are quite similar over the last 50 years; over the last 100 years the corrected data [the one Karl uses] actually shows less global warming."