6 ms·

This conversation should distinguish between Docker as a product and container technology in general. A lot of issues that people encounter with Docker specifi

by tazjin 10y ago

This conversation should distinguish between Docker as a product and container technology in general. A lot of issues that people encounter with Docker specifically disappear if you run Kubernetes (such as volume management), simply by ignoring what Docker does and doing something sane instead. > Or do you mean that Docker etc. are as reliable as bare metal? This doesn't really mean anything, Docker the product has a lot issues - sure. Container technology in general? No. Where do you draw the line here? Is a chroot 'as reliable as bare metal'? At what point is a container not running on bare metal anymore?

guardiangod 10y ago
Of course Namespace in Linux kernel is very mature. But if that's all people use, then there wouldn't be a need for Docker and its extra features- people would still be using LXC (no disrespect to LXC). People have to evaluate the entire software as a whole, instead of just looking at the core technology. I personally feel that Docker is still unproven in terms of maturity. Stateless? Hell yes. Stateful app? Well... As you said, a lot of problems would disappear if people use Kubernetes instead of Docker. At the same time, a lot of replication problems would disappear if people use PostgreSQL instead of MySQL. My point is, when a novice mixes immature technology with immature technology, he is going to have more issues than what's necessary.